IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v6y2016i4p343-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on robustness of the min-max solution to multi-objective linear programs

Author

Listed:
  • Erin K. Doolittle
  • Garrett M. Dranichak
  • Karyn Muir
  • Margaret M. Wiecek

Abstract

The challenge of using scalarising methods in multi-objective optimisation results from the choice of the method, which may not be apparent, and given that a method has been selected, from the choice of the values of the scalarising parameters. In general, these values may be unknown and the decision maker faces a difficult situation of making a choice possibly under a great deal of uncertainty. Due to its effectiveness, the robust optimisation approach of Ben-Tal and Nemirovski is applied to resolve the uncertainty carried in scalarised multi-objective linear programs (MOLPs). A robust counterpart is examined for six different scalarisations of the MOLP yielding robust (weakly) efficient solutions to the original MOLP. The study reveals that the min-max optimal solution emerges as a robust (weakly) efficient solution for five out of the six scalarisations. The implications of this result are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin K. Doolittle & Garrett M. Dranichak & Karyn Muir & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2016. "A note on robustness of the min-max solution to multi-objective linear programs," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 343-365.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:343-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=81390
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:343-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.