IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v5y2015i3p211-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An information delivery strategy for multi criteria reporting: a case study on bankruptcy prediction analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aruldoss Martin
  • Travis Miranda Lakshmi
  • Venkatasamy Prasanna Venkatesan

Abstract

Reporting is very important in the enterprise information processes and it is very much essential for decision making. Finding the user's current requirements and preference and then providing information accordingly could be a challenging task. An efficient information delivery strategy should provide the suitable information to suitable user according to various criteria. The information which is customised based on the criteria should be delivered at the right time for decision making. Bankruptcy prediction analysis (BPA) consists of different number of users with requirement to different levels of information. The proposed information delivery strategy customises the information, resolves inconsistency and uncertainty issues and finds the suitable user to receive the information with respect to criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP). The different level user preference (most suitable user to least suitable user) has been identified according to the criteria using this strategy to deliver the multi criteria reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Aruldoss Martin & Travis Miranda Lakshmi & Venkatasamy Prasanna Venkatesan, 2015. "An information delivery strategy for multi criteria reporting: a case study on bankruptcy prediction analysis," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 211-246.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:5:y:2015:i:3:p:211-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=71249
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:5:y:2015:i:3:p:211-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.