IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v10y2025i2p220-249.html

Multicriteria evaluation of urban mobility actions in the framework of sustainable urban mobility plans: the case of the Great Walk of Athens

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Spyropoulos
  • Stelios Rozakis
  • Ioannis Kanakis
  • Despina Dimelli
  • Eleni Androulidaki

Abstract

The European Union has been actively promoting sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMP) for cities to explicit strategies and effective tools toward sustainable mobility. In 2019 with SUMP at its early phases, the Municipality of Athens opted to pre-emptively implement an ambitious urban mobility project, the so-called Great Walk of Athens that despite considerable funding and effort invested was eventually abandoned. Drawing from strategic planning literature, we combine methods to systematically design such project. For this purpose a hybrid SWOT-analytic hierarchy process (AHP) generates strategic objectives then detailed in short- and long-term actions aligned with EU priorities such as active travel promotion, governance strengthening, and digital innovation. The study demonstrates how multi-criteria decision methods can enhance participatory planning, improve transparency in ranking, and support the integration of mobility projects within broader SUMP strategies. While the findings are context-specific, the approach offers transferable insights for cities across Europe facing similar mobility challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Spyropoulos & Stelios Rozakis & Ioannis Kanakis & Despina Dimelli & Eleni Androulidaki, 2025. "Multicriteria evaluation of urban mobility actions in the framework of sustainable urban mobility plans: the case of the Great Walk of Athens," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 220-249.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:220-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=150307
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:220-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.