IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmabs/v6y2025i1p24-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The prevalence of emotionality and spirituality over rationality in knowmads' career decision making: a qualitative case study on individual knowledge dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Andra Nicoleta Iliescu

Abstract

The knowmad concept represents a neologism rooted in the concepts of knowledge, and nomadism. Introduced in the early 21st century, it represents an unique group characterised by adaptability and resilience within global, digital, and technologically advanced markets. Rooted in continual learning and multicultural competencies, knowmads fluidly navigate various professional fields, embodying creativity and innovation amidst uncertainty. This study delves into the decision-making processes of knowmads through a knowledge dynamics perspective, incorporating rational, emotional, and spiritual motivators. Utilising data collected from a focus group and several in-depth interviews with self-identified knowmads, findings highlight the interplay of financial needs, personal development, emotional feedback, and value alignment in their career choices. The research enables the grounded theory technique and points towards the critical role of emotional and spiritual factors alongside rationality in the professional trajectories of knowmads. Despite existing literature and sample size limitations, the study provides insights for future exploration of this evolving workforce phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Andra Nicoleta Iliescu, 2025. "The prevalence of emotionality and spirituality over rationality in knowmads' career decision making: a qualitative case study on individual knowledge dynamics," International Journal of Markets and Business Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 24-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmabs:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:24-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=146954
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmabs:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:24-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=440 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.