IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmabs/v2y2016i3p171-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking business and financial systems in the market economy: the case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice Yolles

Abstract

The market economy is thought by some to have a life of its own, with a self-determining and autonomous dynamic that is sometimes thought of as constituting a living system. A deeper view comes from Whitley's mesoeconomic theory of business systems, where corporate hierarchy and the market establish relationships that when institutionalised generate a potential for generic rule structures. When the generic rules become enacted a market's financial system results. This paper will model the relationship between the business and financial systems. To do this, it will initially introduce a selected conceptual framework (autonomous agency theory) which takes the market to be a living system. The paper then explains Whitley's theory, and following this an examination of the Chinese financial system is made. This will illustrate the connection between the formal and informal financial servicing entities that can lubricate business processes, and indicate issues (seen as system pathologies) capable of delivering a new economic recession. Through agency, the relationship between the business and financial systems is explored, and issues like corruption are considered. Ultimately, we produce a model that clearly distinguishes between the concerns of macroeconomics and mesoeconomics.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice Yolles, 2016. "Linking business and financial systems in the market economy: the case of China," International Journal of Markets and Business Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 171-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmabs:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:171-205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=81540
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmabs:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:171-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=440 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.