IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v53y2026i4p558-587.html

Backorder prediction in supply chain management - comparing the contribution of machine learning and LSTM classifier in an industrial context

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Kumar Sharma
  • Aarti Rana

Abstract

In this study, the comparative analysis between various machine learning techniques and LSTM (deep learning classifier) are employed to predict demand and backorders based on previous sales, national inventory, the minimum recommended local stock, pipeline inventory, and lead time. Various machine learning algorithms are used for evaluating three-month, six-month, and nine-month data for predicting backorder. The performance metrics considered in study are accuracy, precision, F1-score, AUC values, MAE, RMSE, and log-loss. A dataset from Kaggle's repository has been taken to conduct experiments for backorder prediction the findings of various experiments favour AdaBoost classifier, which has AUC value 82.6% for three-month forecasting. Random forest provides 99.3% AUC value for six-month and 85.65% for nine-month prediction. Conversely, the deep learning (LSTM) classifiers provide AUC values of 89.37%, 91.51% and 80.76% for three-month, six-month, and nine-month prediction processes respectively. LSTM gives AUC, log-loss and MSE values much better compare to other model. In the end, it is found that the bagging classifier provides better results as compared to the single classifier, and is even much better than deep learning (LSTM) classifier, there are not many classifiers that can compete with AdaBoost and random forest in terms of accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Kumar Sharma & Aarti Rana, 2026. "Backorder prediction in supply chain management - comparing the contribution of machine learning and LSTM classifier in an industrial context," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 53(4), pages 558-587.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:53:y:2026:i:4:p:558-587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=152872
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:53:y:2026:i:4:p:558-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.