IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v43y2022i1p112-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy logic for measuring performance of traditional aquaculture fish supply chain by considering the environmental impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Dzakiyah Widyaningrum
  • Said Salim Dahda
  • Rika Ampuh Hadiguna

Abstract

This research measures aquaculture fish supply chain (SC) performance using fuzzy logic. SC performance needs to be measured to assess how good it is. It must be done by considering the uniqueness and complexity. SC is a complex system due to its uncertainties, many actors, and different indicators. Extensive aquaculture fish is a perishable product, seasonal, and has high dependence on nature. The high dependence on nature is greatly influenced by the environment around the pond. These make the aquaculture fish SC also unique. The uniqueness and complexity will make it difficult to determine the level of SC performance. This difficulty can be overcome by using fuzzy logic. The respondents in this study were six experts in the SC. There are seven criteria to measure, i.e., facility, flexibility, efficiency, quality, responsiveness, government involvement, and environment. The result found that the overall SC performance is extremely good; with the distributors having the lowest performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Dzakiyah Widyaningrum & Said Salim Dahda & Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2022. "Fuzzy logic for measuring performance of traditional aquaculture fish supply chain by considering the environmental impacts," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 43(1), pages 112-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:43:y:2022:i:1:p:112-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125683
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:43:y:2022:i:1:p:112-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.