IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v41y2022i3p295-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of container port selection criteria from the importers' perspective: a study in southern Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Victória Karolina Macedo Pasquali
  • Guilherme Bergmann Borges Vieira
  • Erica Caetano Roos
  • Jonas Mendes Constante

Abstract

Port selection is an important topic for scholars and practitioners, and importers have an important role in the port selection. The current study presents an analysis on port selection criteria from the point of view of importers in southern Brazil. First, a literature research was conducted to identify how port selection is structured and then the most cited criteria for port selection were identified. Using these criteria, a quantitative, descriptive and causal research was carried out through the application of a questionnaire to a sample of importers. Data were analysed by descriptive statistical analysis and multiple linear regression and it was possible to identify the most relevant port selection factors considered by the importers. Among these factors, inland transportation costs (from the port to import destination), port efficiency and infrastructure stood out. These factors accounted for 75% of the overall evaluation, according to the R2 found in the regression analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Victória Karolina Macedo Pasquali & Guilherme Bergmann Borges Vieira & Erica Caetano Roos & Jonas Mendes Constante, 2022. "Analysis of container port selection criteria from the importers' perspective: a study in southern Brazil," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(3), pages 295-310.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:41:y:2022:i:3:p:295-310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=122964
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:41:y:2022:i:3:p:295-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.