IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijklea/v17y2024i1p59-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evaluation of students' satisfaction with instructor performance having major key factors: the case of a Vietnamese university

Author

Listed:
  • Thao-Trang Huynh-Cam
  • Vimal Kumar
  • Van-Canh Nguyen
  • Bich-Van Le-Thi
  • Huynh Le

Abstract

The study aims to identify key factors contributing to students' satisfaction with instructor performance in English courses in order to assist higher educational institutions to maintain high levels of students' retention, to reduce dropout percentage, and to benchmark in terms of educational supply chain management. The sample is 438 responses provided by 226 undergraduates of nineteen English courses. Correlation and regression analysis were utilised in order to study the relationships among the factors. The results indicate that all five factors with 24 items influence positively and significantly and designed based on the experience of the researchers rather than on the experts' evaluation and students' opinions. This study contributes four factors with 20 items for determining students' satisfaction with instructor performance in English courses. These factors can assist HEIs to maintain high levels of students' retention, reducing dropout percentage, and benchmark with peer courses and departments in terms of educational SCM.

Suggested Citation

  • Thao-Trang Huynh-Cam & Vimal Kumar & Van-Canh Nguyen & Bich-Van Le-Thi & Huynh Le, 2024. "The evaluation of students' satisfaction with instructor performance having major key factors: the case of a Vietnamese university," International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 59-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijklea:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:59-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135410
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijklea:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:59-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.