IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijkbde/v16y2026i2p138-155.html

Knowledge graph embedding with semantic similarity for e-recruitment recommendation systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hakim Mokeddem
  • Mama Saadia Benelhadj Djelloul
  • Mohammed Dhiya Eddine Gouaouri

Abstract

This paper proposes an e-recruitment recommendation framework to improve matching between job offers and candidate resumes. It relies on a knowledge graph built from an ontology structured around Domain, Occupation, and Skill, aligned with ESCO and populated using 300,000 profiles. The framework focuses on knowledge graph embeddings (KGE) combined with semantic similarity modeling to improve the matching between candidates and job offers. It uses a semantic similarity model based on a transformer autoencoder (TSDAE) to capture contextual relationships between entities, including skills and occupations. These semantic representations are integrated with KGE-based candidate ranking, enabling the system to consider both explicit and inferred skills from professional experience, and thus provide more accurate and context-aware recommendations. Evaluation results show promising performance: expert validation of the knowledge graph achieved a 70-74% skill validation rate in IT domains. The tsdae-distiluse-multilingual-bert model performed best in similarity tasks, while the ConvE based ranking approach slightly outperformed DistMult with mp@3 = 0.775 and ndcg@3 = 0.810.

Suggested Citation

  • Hakim Mokeddem & Mama Saadia Benelhadj Djelloul & Mohammed Dhiya Eddine Gouaouri, 2026. "Knowledge graph embedding with semantic similarity for e-recruitment recommendation systems," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 138-155.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijkbde:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:138-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=155184
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijkbde:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:138-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=354 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.