IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijitma/v1y2002i4p357-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation predictors of strategic information systems plans: a comparison of Australian and Norwegian firms

Author

Listed:
  • Petter Gottschalk, Vijay K. Khandelwal

Abstract

The need for improved implementation of information technology (IT) strategy has been emphasised in both empirical and prescriptive research studies. In this study, ten content characteristics of formal information technology strategies are identified from the research literature as potential implementation predictors. Surveys were conducted in both Norway and Australia. In Norway, the two statistically significant predictors in the testing of hypotheses were the description of responsibility for the implementation and the description of user involvement during the implementation. In Australia, the only statistically significant predictor was the description of projects' relevance to the business plan. Generally, strategic issues seemed to be important implementation predictors in Australia, while resource issues seemed to be important implementation predictors in Norway. However, the statistical results are somewhat inconclusive because of the limited sample sizes, response rates and explanatory power.

Suggested Citation

  • Petter Gottschalk, Vijay K. Khandelwal, 2002. "Implementation predictors of strategic information systems plans: a comparison of Australian and Norwegian firms," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 357-366.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:1:y:2002:i:4:p:357-366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=1205
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:1:y:2002:i:4:p:357-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=18 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.