IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijitma/v10y2011i1p69-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An econometric model for evaluating success/failure of an R&D project: the case of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Johng-Ihl Lee

Abstract

The financial crisis in 1997, which led Korea to the IMF management system, had offered the realisation of the technological competitiveness, owing to the significant increase of the government R&D budget from 3.5 trillion won in 1999 to 12 trillion in 2009. This paper examines the impact of government R&D incentives on the technological outcome by analysing firms' investment behaviours subject to the Korea's technology development program. Based on a mathematical model considering uncertainty and consequently introduced hypotheses, an econometric model of technological outcomes is estimated on a project level with cross-sectional data from Korea's R&D program. With a single equation approach, it is found that the structure of investment is a far more significant factor than the total amount of investment and that cash investment is a positive factor and in-kind for negative. The larger the number of institutions involved in a project, the less likely it leads to success, and meeting the proposed deadlines without postponing is estimated to be a good barometer to predict the successful outcome of an R&D project.

Suggested Citation

  • Johng-Ihl Lee, 2011. "An econometric model for evaluating success/failure of an R&D project: the case of Korea," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 69-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:10:y:2011:i:1:p:69-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=37763
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:10:y:2011:i:1:p:69-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=18 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.