IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisma/v3y2007i1p52-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The logistical impact of EU enlargement the case of the Baltic States

Author

Listed:
  • Tapio Naula
  • Lauri M. Ojala

Abstract

The paper deals with the logistical impacts that EU enlargement has brought about, using the development in the Baltic States and the Nordic context as an example. On 1, May 2004 10 new countries joined the European Union (EU), increasing EU's population by 17%. Subsequently, EU's Gross Domestic Product grew 8% at Purchasing Power Parity basis but only 4% at market rates. Looking from the macro economic perspective, the 'old' EU 15 had no difficulty absorbing the 'new' EU 10. The overall conclusions are as follows: first, accession had a significant impact on day-to-day trade practices of the new Member States, especially in intra-EU trade. Second, EU membership did not dramatically change the new Members' trade or Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) patterns. This is because the acceding countries had rapidly integrated to the world economy already during the preceding years. Third, very few problems with trade and border crossing practices in intra-EU trade were reported in Estonia, Lithuania, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovenia after May 1, 2004. New Member States need to implement a way to monitor their logistics environment and firms' logistics efficiency on a regular basis. A periodically conducted survey would serve as a valuable source of information for identifying needs for further improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tapio Naula & Lauri M. Ojala, 2007. "The logistical impact of EU enlargement the case of the Baltic States," International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 52-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisma:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:52-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=11449
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisma:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:52-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=81 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.