IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisma/v18y2026i2p156-183.html

Evaluation of picker-to-parts order-picking technologies through field experiments: a comparison of performance, cost, and environmental impact

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasios Gialos
  • Vasileios Zeimpekis

Abstract

Although the order-picking process significantly affects warehouse productivity and operating costs, only a few studies have evaluated how the performance of such systems may be influenced using specific order-picking technologies. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the performance of four order-picking technologies in terms of efficiency, operational/investment cost, and environmental impact. Employing a general mixed-level full factorial experimental design, system efficiency is examined through field-based experiments. Operational cost and carbon footprint are calculated by adopting the activity-based costing methodology, and certain emission factors based on ISO14067:2018 standard. The results indicate that pick-by-light achieves the highest efficiency and lowest cost per order line, while pick-by-paper and pick-by-RF scanner exhibit substantially lower performance, and notable trade-offs emerge between cost and environmental impact across technologies. Furthermore, the results reveal that combining an efficient order-picking technology with an experienced workforce and well-designed orders can significantly enhance the performance of order-picking systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasios Gialos & Vasileios Zeimpekis, 2026. "Evaluation of picker-to-parts order-picking technologies through field experiments: a comparison of performance, cost, and environmental impact," International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2), pages 156-183.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisma:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:156-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=152985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisma:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:156-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=81 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.