IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v5y2010i4p442-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple response optimisation: methods and results

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno Ricardo Pais Costa

Abstract

In multi-response problems, optimal factor settings for one response may be far from optimal or even physically impractical for the other responses. A common approach for multi-response optimisation consists in searching for factor settings that provide the best trade-off among all the responses. To identify the method which can provide the best trade-off when optimisation is made in the response surface methodology (RSM) framework, various methods are reviewed and their performance assessed through examples from the literature. A new measure is proposed to evaluate the optimisation performance of methods which use different criteria and different approaches. Illustrative examples show that, in the RSM framework, it is possible to achieve the lowest cumulative deviation of the estimated responses from their target value by using desirability function-based methods. In particular, those solutions are achieved with a method that can be easily used by practitioners, which is an additional stimulus for its application in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno Ricardo Pais Costa, 2010. "Multiple response optimisation: methods and results," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 442-459.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:442-459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=32966
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:5:y:2010:i:4:p:442-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.