IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v50y2025i4p433-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing and assessing cognitive training application for seniors with MCI: comprehensive evaluation methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Zhang
  • Yazhen Lan
  • Shan Hu

Abstract

This study addresses the absence of design standards for cognitive training apps catering to seniors with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods, it employs grounded theory (GT) for synthesising user interview data and iteratively refines design criteria through theoretical coding. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) objectively establish weights for design evaluation criteria and finalise the weighting values using the combined ideal point assignment method. The VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) is used to evaluate and select design solutions. This comprehensive approach minimises subjectivity and bias in criteria determination and weighting, enhancing the Objectivity and accuracy of cognitive training application evaluations. Usability questionnaires and user testing validate that the integrated approach improves design decisions' objectivity and scientificity, making the application more responsive to user needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Zhang & Yazhen Lan & Shan Hu, 2025. "Designing and assessing cognitive training application for seniors with MCI: comprehensive evaluation methodology," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 50(4), pages 433-464.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:433-464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=147716
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:50:y:2025:i:4:p:433-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.