IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v45y2023i3p271-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process improvement using Six Sigma DMAIC in the bearing component manufacturing industry: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Sandeep Kumar Bhaskar
  • Manoj Kumar Sain
  • Manu Augustine
  • Praveen Saraswat
  • Brij Mohan Sharma

Abstract

Bearing parts manufacturing process is highly crucial in maintaining the quality of final product. This paper elaborates the use of the Six Sigma DMAIC approach to minimise variation in dimensions of inner and outer races of ball bearings for enhancing process quality in a manufacturing firm. In various phases of DMAIC, Six Sigma quality improvement tools like voice of customers and employee, statistical process control, control charts, process capability charts, customer/employee survey, and fishbone diagram were used. MINITAB18.0 software was used for data analysis. The results revealed that the adoption of the Six Sigma DMAIC approach significantly improved the process quality. Sigma level was improved from 2.5 to 3.8; defects per million opportunities were reduced from 0.632% to 0.023% and process variation was reduced from ±5 to ±3 and was well within target limits.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Kumar Bhaskar & Manoj Kumar Sain & Manu Augustine & Praveen Saraswat & Brij Mohan Sharma, 2023. "Process improvement using Six Sigma DMAIC in the bearing component manufacturing industry: a case study," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 45(3), pages 271-290.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:45:y:2023:i:3:p:271-290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134717
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:45:y:2023:i:3:p:271-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.