IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v1y2006i4p461-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of literature on manufacturing systems productivity measurement and improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Kanthi M.N. Muthiah
  • Samuel H. Huang

Abstract

Globalisation is posing several challenges to the manufacturing sector. Design and operation of manufacturing systems are of great economic importance. Factory performance remains unpredictable, in spite of the considerable literature on manufacturing productivity improvement and the long history of manufacturing, as there is no widespread agreement on how it can best be performed (Gershwin, 2000). Productivity measurement and improvement goes hand in hand, because one cannot improve what one cannot measure. The review of literature on manufacturing systems productivity measurement and improvement has been summarised under four categories; they are Operations Research- (OR-) based methods, system analysis-based methods, continuous improvement methods and performance metrics-based methods. A survey of commercial tools available to measure manufacturing system performance is also performed. The review indicates that quantitative metrics for measuring factory level productivity and for performing factory level diagnostics (bottleneck detection, hidden capacity identification) are lacking. To address this gap, a factory level effectiveness metrics-based productivity measurement and diagnostic methodology is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanthi M.N. Muthiah & Samuel H. Huang, 2006. "A review of literature on manufacturing systems productivity measurement and improvement," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 461-484.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:1:y:2006:i:4:p:461-484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=10387
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beldina Owalla & Cristian Gherhes & Tim Vorley & Chay Brooks, 2022. "Mapping SME productivity research: a systematic review of empirical evidence and future research agenda," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1285-1307, March.
    2. Mildrend Montoya-Reyes & Margarita Gil-Samaniego-Ramos & Alvaro González-Angeles & Ismael Mendoza-Muñoz & Carlos Raul Navarro-González, 2020. "Novel Ergonomic Triad Model to Calculate a Sustainable Work Index for the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:1:y:2006:i:4:p:461-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.