IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisde/v7y2013i2p111-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crossing borders and linking plural knowledge: biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and human well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Fátima Alves
  • Walter Leal Filho
  • Maria José Araújo
  • Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro

Abstract

The challenges we face today in terms of local, regional and global environmental changes and pressures on biodiversity can only be addressed with a close coupling of approaches from natural and social sciences together with local knowledge. The authors emphasise that biodiversity research and intervention should integrate this new comprehensive perspective, bringing together biological sciences, social sciences and local knowledge. This approach should demystify the traditional dichotomies that still impose epistemological and moral reductionist borders between nature and culture, systematically hiding the heuristic value of the social and cultural dimension of biodiversity loss. In this context, biodiversity is a field dominated by multiple tensions between plural knowledge within science itself and local knowledge (less visible), which brings to the discussion conflicts that are inherent to science, technology, economics, sociology, politics and culture. This is a fundamental dimension to understand and respond to the challenges we are facing on biodiversity loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Fátima Alves & Walter Leal Filho & Maria José Araújo & Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro, 2013. "Crossing borders and linking plural knowledge: biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and human well-being," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 111-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:111-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53323
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:7:y:2013:i:2:p:111-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=33 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.