IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisde/v14y2020i3p330-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying ISO26000 and the sufficiency economy philosophy to measure the sustainability of state owned enterprises in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Nattawee Chaloemvivatkit
  • Aim-Orn Jaikengkit

Abstract

This study intends to construct a composite index for the government, in order to assess and improve Thai State Owned Enterprises (SOEs)'s financial performance, operations, and ethical behaviours; according to the sustainability definition as put forward by Coblentz (2002). The construction of the index follows the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)'s approach, and was compiled by surveying existing literature related to ISO 26000, the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy, and the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard (SBSC). After in-depth and semi-structured interviews with the experts, the data from 55 SOEs during the period 2010 to 2017 were statistically tested. The resulting index was composed of four dimensions namely, leadership which focuses on ethics and balanced growth; sustainable strategic management; managing finances with balance and sufficiency; and good governance and the promotion of responsibility and sufficiency within SOEs. The assessment results from this index will benefit the government in terms of the determination of policy and lead to improvements to SOEs' sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nattawee Chaloemvivatkit & Aim-Orn Jaikengkit, 2020. "Applying ISO26000 and the sufficiency economy philosophy to measure the sustainability of state owned enterprises in Thailand," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 330-350.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:14:y:2020:i:3:p:330-350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:14:y:2020:i:3:p:330-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=33 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.