IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisde/v12y2018i4p446-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of conventional and fair trade systems on dimensions of sustainability: a study of basmati rice procurement in India

Author

Listed:
  • Rajni Kant Sharma
  • Naseem Abidi
  • Kaleem Mohammad Khan

Abstract

Conventional procurement at farm level, as starting point of the supply chain and a crucial link to farmer livelihoods and impact on sustainability, remains specifically ineffective in India. Initiatives like Fair Trade, in domain of 'alternative trade' mechanisms, have made inroads in global agricultural trade bridging the ethical consumers of the west to marginalised farmers in developing countries like India. This research paper explores indicators on all the dimensions of sustainability through literature as well as through exploratory factor analysis on primary data collected from Indian farmers who follow either conventional system or Fair Trade system to dispose their produce (basmati rice). The study also compares these systems on all indicators and dimensions of sustainability. It also explores the strength, weaknesses, suggestions to improve and reasons for formers to remain in the system. Findings suggest that Fair Trade system is better on almost all dimensions of sustainability than conventional system.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajni Kant Sharma & Naseem Abidi & Kaleem Mohammad Khan, 2018. "Comparison of conventional and fair trade systems on dimensions of sustainability: a study of basmati rice procurement in India," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 446-468.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:12:y:2018:i:4:p:446-468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:12:y:2018:i:4:p:446-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=33 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.