IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijiscm/v9y2017i1p3-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergies and conflicts among software quality attributes and bug fixes

Author

Listed:
  • Raed Shatnawi

Abstract

Quality has great effect on acceptance and behaviour of software products under operation. Quality has many perspectives for users, engineers and managers. These perspectives are represented formally in a quality model that is composed of both external and internal measures. External quality attributes can be measured indirectly using internal properties of the software product. Many external attributes are of interest to manager of software production and are combined in a framework or a quality model. However, these attributes may have interrelationships, positive or negative (conflicts). In addition, external quality attributes may have relationships with bugs in a component or system. In this research, we aim to find empirical evidence of the interrelationships among six quality attributes (reusability, flexibility, understandability, functionality, extendibility and effectiveness) and with bugs. We also demonstrate the evolution of these quality attributes in consecutive releases. Eleven open-source systems and their evolutions are considered to study the research objectives. The results could not show a relationship between the quality attributes and bugs in systems. The evolution of systems is consistent with the evolution in quality, i.e., quality increases in consecutive releases. There are some positive and low negative relationships among the quality attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Raed Shatnawi, 2017. "Synergies and conflicts among software quality attributes and bug fixes," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 3-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:3-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86209
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:3-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=79 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.