IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijiscm/v1y2006i4p421-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capturing industry experience for an effective information security assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Chuan Chao
  • Kuanchin Chen
  • Chien-Hua Lin

Abstract

An Information System (IS) security programme consists of several essential security controls. In order to verify and maintain the effectiveness of an IS security programme, it is pertinent to identify how security controls are compared to each other in terms of their practical implications. This study reports the results from an experience survey to offer insights of the roles of security controls in IS security programmes. Four clusters of security controls were identified with technical security controls (such as authentication and confidentiality) being high on respondents' perceived importance. An approach to develop SAI with weighted security controls is explained to help security administrators conduct security assessments. The results of this study contribute to IS security budget planning and resource allocation. Managerial implications are also reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Chuan Chao & Kuanchin Chen & Chien-Hua Lin, 2006. "Capturing industry experience for an effective information security assessment," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 421-438.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:1:y:2006:i:4:p:421-438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=12048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:1:y:2006:i:4:p:421-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=79 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.