IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v6y2009i6p581-592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dark side of custom animation

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Mahar
  • Ulku Yaylacicegi
  • Thomas Janicki

Abstract

Over the last decade, PowerPoint has become the medium of choice for many instructors. The software provides animation options for the emphasis, entry or disappearance of text and figures. Many instructors use these options regularly with the impression that such effects enhance student learning by allowing concepts to be introduced incrementally. This research explores the impact of custom animation in PowerPoint lectures and examines the idea that custom animation may, in fact, negatively impact student learning. To test this hypothesis, two versions of a PowerPoint lecture were recorded in Camtasia Studio. The presentations differed only in the presence of animation to incrementally present information. To assess the impact of custom animation on student learning, students were shown either the animated or non-animated recordings and were tested regarding the presented information. The computational results show a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the means of overall student performance after viewing lectures with non-animated and animated PowerPoint slides, suggesting that static slides allow students to retain more information than their dynamic counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Mahar & Ulku Yaylacicegi & Thomas Janicki, 2009. "The dark side of custom animation," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(6), pages 581-592.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:6:y:2009:i:6:p:581-592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=26645
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:6:y:2009:i:6:p:581-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.