IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v6y2009i4p406-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational learning and development: lessons from productivity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kongkiti Phusavat
  • Pornthep Anussornnitisarn
  • Bordin Rassameethes
  • Petri Helo
  • Pekka Kess

Abstract

This study assists the productivity analysis of a large electronic manufacturer in Thailand. This company is to be referred to as the STT. The problem stems from the underlying concern on how to effectively utilise productivity information and strengthen organisational learning and development at the plant level. The term 'productivity' is defined as the Value-added Cost (VAC) divided by the total cost. Its VAC represents the total value of the outputs subtracted by the material cost. Four Productivity Networks (PNs) from Harper's (1984) concept are developed for this task. The data for productivity measurement have been collected over the period of 18 months. The productivity information that reflects the areas of concern suggested by the STT's senior management is analysed. The results imply that the ratios of the Variable Cost-to-Operation Cost, Operation Cost-to-Total Cost, VAC-to-Other Production Cost and Fixed Overhead Cost-to-Operation Cost greatly impact its overall productivity level. Thus, the high-impact elements are the variable, operation and fixed overhead costs. Finally, according to the STT's senior managers, the study helps improve organisational learning and development, deemed to be important for long-term operational competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Kongkiti Phusavat & Pornthep Anussornnitisarn & Bordin Rassameethes & Petri Helo & Pekka Kess, 2009. "Organisational learning and development: lessons from productivity analysis," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 406-421.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:6:y:2009:i:4:p:406-421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=24136
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:6:y:2009:i:4:p:406-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.