IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v5y2008i1p18-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived importance and effectiveness of KM performance outcomes: perspective of institutions of higher learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sharimllah Devi Ramachandran
  • Siong Choy Chong
  • Binshan Lin

Abstract

This article examines the perceived importance and effectiveness of 19 Knowledge Management (KM) performance outcomes based on survey data collected from 185 academics working in a public university in Malaysia. The factor analysis results reveal an important confirmation to the theoretical findings in the literature with respect to the KM performance outcomes. The paired t-test results show a significant difference between all the KM performance outcomes perceived as important and their effectiveness. The result supports findings from the industry setting and suggestions are provided on how Institutions of Higher Learning (IHLs) in general can implement KM effectively from the outcomes perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharimllah Devi Ramachandran & Siong Choy Chong & Binshan Lin, 2008. "Perceived importance and effectiveness of KM performance outcomes: perspective of institutions of higher learning," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 18-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:18-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=15945
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahid Shafait & Jiayu Huang, 2022. "Nexus of Emotional Intelligence and Learning Outcomes: A Cross-Country Study of China and Pakistan Higher Educational Institutes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:18-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.