IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v39y2026i4p380-405.html

Analysing user sentiments in social media: the supremacy of deep learning methods over traditional machine learning techniques

Author

Listed:
  • A. Suruliandi
  • Meenakshi Muthukrishnan
  • S.P. Raja

Abstract

Sentiment analysis plays a crucial role in natural language processing by transforming large-scale textual data from social media into meaningful business insights. This study explores three key sentiment analysis approaches; emotion detection sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and intent-based sentiment analysis and evaluates the performance of traditional machine learning and deep learning models. The study assesses machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine, multinomial Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest against deep learning models, including BERT, LSTM, CNN, RNN, and GRU. Performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The findings indicate that deep learning models outperform traditional machine learning techniques, with LSTM achieving the highest accuracy of 93.91%. The study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different sentiment analysis models, highlighting deep learning's advantage in capturing complex sentiment structures.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Suruliandi & Meenakshi Muthukrishnan & S.P. Raja, 2026. "Analysing user sentiments in social media: the supremacy of deep learning methods over traditional machine learning techniques," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 39(4), pages 380-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:39:y:2026:i:4:p:380-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=153972
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:39:y:2026:i:4:p:380-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.