IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v38y2025i2p158-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The analysis of cross-applicational effectiveness of gamification in English teaching

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Helvich
  • Lukas Novak
  • Stepan Hubalovsky
  • Katerina Juklova

Abstract

Over the last decade, gamification applications have successfully permeated the English language learning framework with promising results. However, there is still a notable scarcity of quality research on gamified English teaching. Specifically, how English teachers perceive individual gamification applications and how their perceptions differ. The objective is to compare English teachers' perceptions of gamification applications and explore their perceived differential impact on learners' motivation, language learning outcomes, GPAs, and applicability. A sample of 615 Czech English teachers was used to conduct a series of Kruskal-Wallis and subsequent post-hoc tests to examine the differences between four gamification applications (Kahoot!, Quizizz, Quizlet, and Wordwall). The analysis found no statistically significant difference between the applications in how they impact learners' motivation, language learning outcomes, and GPAs, but statistically significant differences have been found between Quizizz, Kahoot!, and Quizlet in how they are applicable to English teaching.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Helvich & Lukas Novak & Stepan Hubalovsky & Katerina Juklova, 2025. "The analysis of cross-applicational effectiveness of gamification in English teaching," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 38(2), pages 158-178.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:38:y:2025:i:2:p:158-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=148244
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:38:y:2025:i:2:p:158-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.