IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v37y2025i6p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Garbage in garbage out: Likert scale in management research

Author

Listed:
  • Borut Kodrič
  • Anita Trnavčevič
  • Tine Bertoncel
  • Nada Trunk Širca

Abstract

Master's and PhD programs worldwide vary in the quality of their programs, learning opportunities, and outcomes, including those in management. Master's and PhD theses can be published in various forms, such as traditional theses, articles, or monographic publications. These academic works often incorporate data gathered through surveys, especially in the case of social sciences research, whether in quantitative studies or mixed methods research designs. Psychometric measurements and Likert scales are often employed in surveys. However, the proper use of Likert and other measurement scales is sometimes questionable due to inappropriate application. Management research holds dual values: one for researchers and another for practitioners, policymakers, consultants, and companies. Therefore, master's and PhD theses must contribute high-quality results, which are achieved through high-quality data collection instruments. To gain initial insight into the quality of questionnaires used in Master's and PhD theses in the field of management, this research was conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Borut Kodrič & Anita Trnavčevič & Tine Bertoncel & Nada Trunk Širca, 2025. "Garbage in garbage out: Likert scale in management research," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 37(6), pages 1-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145684
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.