IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v34y2023i3p271-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on employee mindfulness and organisational citizenship behaviour: job satisfaction and in-role behaviour as mediators

Author

Listed:
  • Thuy Dung Pham Thi
  • Nam Tien Duong

Abstract

This study aimed to examine whether employees improve their job satisfaction and performance with mindfulness. A remote mediating model was used with mindfulness as an independent variable, job satisfaction (JS) and in-role behaviour (IRB) as mediating variables, and organisational citizenship behaviour - individual (OCBI) and organisational citizenship behaviour - organisation (OCBO) as dependent variables. Questionnaires were delivered to 381 employees in Vietnam. A path analysis was used with bootstrapping estimation for hypothesis testing. The findings showed that: 1) employee mindfulness could be a predictor of JS, IRB, OCBI and OCBO; 2) JS can be a predictor of IRB, OCBI and OCBO; 3) IRB can be a predictor of OCBI and OCBO; 4) with JS and IRB as mediating variables in sequence, mindfulness has a partial remote mediating effect on both OCBI and OCBO. The findings suggested that companies should pay attention to the mindfulness of interviewees when recruiting new employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Thuy Dung Pham Thi & Nam Tien Duong, 2023. "A study on employee mindfulness and organisational citizenship behaviour: job satisfaction and in-role behaviour as mediators," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 271-289.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:271-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=133175
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:271-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.