IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v33y2023i3p344-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions and the new paradigm of Thai vocational education

Author

Listed:
  • Nongluck Manowaluilou
  • Prachyanun Nilsook
  • Prompilai Buasuwan

Abstract

The objectives were to: 1) assess and analyse students' perceptions toward vocational education; 2) propose a new paradigm and alternative pathways to change students' perceptions about vocational education. The use of mixed methods in this study developed a better understanding of secondary students' decisions towards vocational education. The results obtained from different methods have enriched the understanding of vocational education issues and advanced research in vocational education. A five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to analyse the perceptions of 802 secondary students from six Thai regions toward vocational education. In-depth interviews with 18 students in grades 7-12 were analysed using a content analysis. Secondary students who had completed or were enrolled in vocational education influenced secondary students' views on vocational education. A new paradigm is required for new vocational education images, which may modify the image of vocational education and contribute to a new paradigm shift in vocational education.

Suggested Citation

  • Nongluck Manowaluilou & Prachyanun Nilsook & Prompilai Buasuwan, 2023. "Perceptions and the new paradigm of Thai vocational education," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(3), pages 344-365.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:33:y:2023:i:3:p:344-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=130101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:33:y:2023:i:3:p:344-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.