IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v32y2022i3p305-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neurological examination lab during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an experience from Humanitas University, Milan, Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Biroli
  • Valeriano Vinci
  • Licia Montagna
  • Silvia Oldani

Abstract

Core diagnostic and physical examination skills in neurology are fundamental for aspiring physicians. Merging theory with practical activities is an efficient way to strengthen the learning process. However, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic hard tested the possibility to perform them. This article aims at describing/evaluating the way Humanitas University managed this issue implementing innovative flipped-learning-based activities. The five-day neurology lab was re-designed aiming at avoiding unnecessary contacts, maximising skills acquisition and meeting students' needs, satisfaction, expectations. Mandatory SARS-CoV-2 serology/swab testing before activities' beginning assured every student's safety. Student's satisfaction assessment, performed through two online questionnaires, showed that the new organisation of the neurological lab received significantly higher appreciation compared to previous year's activities. Flipped-learning-based activities helped grasping the essence of different neurological syndromes and the required skills to recognise them. In view of this, we believe that flipped-learning-based activities could constitute a powerful innovative method to build solid knowledge in the neurology field.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Biroli & Valeriano Vinci & Licia Montagna & Silvia Oldani, 2022. "Neurological examination lab during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an experience from Humanitas University, Milan, Italy," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(3), pages 305-321.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:32:y:2022:i:3:p:305-321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125773
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:32:y:2022:i:3:p:305-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.