IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v30y2021i4p441-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-cognitive constructs measurement model development based on the theory of planned behaviour in the context of the academic performance of engineering students

Author

Listed:
  • Bhausaheb Londhe
  • Bhisaji C. Surve

Abstract

This study is an application of 'theory of planned behaviour' (Ajzen, 1991; Ajzen and Driver, 1992; Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975) which is an extension of the theory of reasoned action (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975). As in the original theory of reasoned action, a vital factor in the theory of planned behaviour is the individual's intention to perform a given behaviour. In this paper, it is in the context of the educational process. This confirmatory analysis is a factor analysis that is designed to predict and explain how student intention determines a student's performance in academic achievements. The researchers are proposing a model based on structural equation modelling (SEM) with six non-cognitive traits simultaneously. The model is to establish causal inferences between these traits with academic performance over a period of four years in the context of engineering studies. The scope and focus of this paper are to develop and validate the measurement model as a prerequisite towards model development based on the theory of planned behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhausaheb Londhe & Bhisaji C. Surve, 2021. "Non-cognitive constructs measurement model development based on the theory of planned behaviour in the context of the academic performance of engineering students," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(4), pages 441-461.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:441-461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118872
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:441-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.