IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v30y2021i3p358-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the four-level inquiry continuum on college students' higher order thinking and peer interaction tendencies

Author

Listed:
  • Kaili Lu
  • Harrison Yang
  • Hui Xue

Abstract

Research positively associates inquiry-based learning (IBL) activities to the benefits of students' higher order thinking, collaboration, and communication skill. However, few studies have examined the impact of IBL activities on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) and peer interaction at all levels of inquiry. This study examined 58 college students' perceptions of their HOTS and peer interaction tendencies from the perspective of a four-level inquiry continuum process. Overall, the study found that as IBL activities moved from the first level of inquiry (confirmation inquiry) to the fourth level of inquiry (open inquiry), students' HOTS and peer interaction tendencies strengthened. Further analysis showed that students' HOTS and peer interaction tendencies changed significantly at different levels of IBL activities. Highly student-centred IBL activities were significantly more effective than highly teacher-directed activities. In addition, there was a strong correlation between students' HOTS and peer interaction tendencies in IBL activities. The findings of this study have practical implications for educators, indicating that they should design, develop, and implement IBL activities, considering all four levels of inquiry as a continuum. Educators should also find ways to leverage the relationship between students' higher HOTS and peer interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaili Lu & Harrison Yang & Hui Xue, 2021. "Investigating the four-level inquiry continuum on college students' higher order thinking and peer interaction tendencies," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(3), pages 358-367.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:358-367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118192
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sha Zhu & Qing Guo & Harrison Hao Yang, 2023. "Beyond the Traditional: A Systematic Review of Digital Game-Based Assessment for Students’ Knowledge, Skills, and Affections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:358-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.