IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v30y2021i3p262-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and evaluation of digital forms of teaching at the university - lecture recordings, inverted classroom, and MOOCs

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Hirmer
  • Andreas Henrich

Abstract

Regarding the higher demand for flexibility in the learning process, universities need to adapt their way of teaching to survive in a digitised world [Scheer, (2017), p.102]. Digitalised forms of teaching like lecture recordings, the inverted classroom (IC), and massive open online courses (MOOCs) may therefore offer decisive advantages. This paper presents an empirical study at the Information Systems and Applied Computer Sciences Faculty (IS % ACS) of the University of Bamberg that aims to evaluate the main requirements for a lecture recording system as well as to analyse the experiences of the lecturers with other digitised forms of teaching like the inverted classroom and massive open online courses. The results have been summarised in a list of requirements for a lecture recording solution and a concluding recommendation for the University of Bamberg.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Hirmer & Andreas Henrich, 2021. "Analysis and evaluation of digital forms of teaching at the university - lecture recordings, inverted classroom, and MOOCs," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(3), pages 262-278.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:262-278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118195
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:262-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.