IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v30y2021i2p154-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of perceived usability on mobile wallet acceptance: a case of Gopay Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Ni Made Estiyanti
  • Delfa Agustia
  • Rafiqa Amini Mulia
  • Randa Alfarisyi
  • Restow Frandha
  • Achmad Nizar Hidayanto
  • Sherah Kurnia

Abstract

The rapid growth of mobile communication technology leads to the more frequently used mobile payments particularly the mobile wallet (m-wallet). This research aims to identify the factors that influence the use intention of mobile wallet in Indonesia, particularly from the perceived usability perspective, combined with the technology acceptance model (TAM). This research employs survey research by distributing an online questionnaire to users of Gopay, which is a leader of m-wallet providers in the Indonesian market. The data from 167 valid respondents were processed and analysed using partial least square (PLS) with the help of SmartPLS 2.0 software. Our findings showed that perceived usability affects users' intention to adopt m-wallet through perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment variables. This paper also discusses several recommendations for m-wallet providers and developers to increase m-wallet adoption in Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Ni Made Estiyanti & Delfa Agustia & Rafiqa Amini Mulia & Randa Alfarisyi & Restow Frandha & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "The impact of perceived usability on mobile wallet acceptance: a case of Gopay Indonesia," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(2), pages 154-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:154-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117220
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:154-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.