IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v28y2020i1p40-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standard competency gaps of vocational teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Delta Apriyani
  • Maria Krisnawati
  • Sita Nurmasitah
  • I. Made Sudana
  • Saian Nur Fajri

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the gaps between the professional competence of vocational high school (VOC) teachers of productive subjects and the professional competence standard in learning activities to produce competent graduates to do their jobs. A questionnaire which was mostly consisting of closed questions and multiple choices and supplemented with in-depth interviews was distributed to provide flexibility wherever needed to respondents and explanations and information freely whose confidentiality of answers is guaranteed by researchers. Convenience sampling was used to obtain smooth data collection from respondents, including ten principals, 50 certified educator teachers from ten vocational schools in Semarang City who have dedication through oral requests participating in this study. This research was conducted for almost three months. It was found that the majority of respondents felt that teacher professional competence was still classified as having a large enough gap to produce an effective and efficient learning process in producing graduates who had competencies in accordance with what was mandated by the curriculum, in order to be able to work referring to the needs of the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Delta Apriyani & Maria Krisnawati & Sita Nurmasitah & I. Made Sudana & Saian Nur Fajri, 2020. "Standard competency gaps of vocational teachers," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(1), pages 40-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:28:y:2020:i:1:p:40-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108474
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:28:y:2020:i:1:p:40-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.