IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v25y2019i4p377-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nature of online students' feedback in higher education

Author

Listed:
  • Syerina Azlin Md Nasir
  • Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob
  • Nurazleena Ismail

Abstract

The response of students to learning is a key element for measuring the extent to which the quality of education is perceived in online learning. Analysing the nature of students' feedback is important in improving student skills and shaping learning behaviour in online learning. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the nature of the feedback itself. We conducted an analysis on students' feedback in web-based learning for two selected courses which were exam based and non-exam based courses. As a result, the feedback received was then categorised using the thematic analysis according to different nature of feedbacks. Next, regression analysis was carried out on the count of discovered nature of feedback to determine its relationship and usefulness as evaluated by the instructor. This study disclosed four disparate natures of feedbacks based on the responses and has significant positive correlation between the use of feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Nurazleena Ismail, 2019. "The nature of online students' feedback in higher education," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(4), pages 377-392.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:25:y:2019:i:4:p:377-392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99982
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:25:y:2019:i:4:p:377-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.