IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v21y2017i4p481-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible hybrid learning: comparison of two approaches and learning results

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Simonova
  • Petra Poulova
  • Katerina Kostolanyova

Abstract

The ICT-enhanced instruction has become widely exploited through hybrid learning. The main objective of this article is to describe this process from the view of various criteria comparing: 1) two approaches to hybrid learning; 2) results of pedagogical experiment conducted at two higher education institutions; 3) tracking students' performance within this process; 4) the role of the mobile devices. Making the process of hybrid learning easier and more flexible to students, the criterion of individual learners' needs and preferences was taken into consideration, when applied in different ways at two Czech higher education institutions which have been the leaders in methodology and practice of the hybrid learning implementation. Their models were exploited in educational practice; and pedagogical experiments comparing learners' knowledge in flexible and non-flexible learning were conducted. However, the results did not prove statistically significant differences in the two approaches. Therefore, deeper attention was paid to the hybrid learning process, particularly to learners' activity within the ICT-enhanced work and the role of mobile technologies. The results show that despite being highly equipped with mobile technologies and having appropriate skills to use them for education, students' activity in the entire process of learning was not high.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Simonova & Petra Poulova & Katerina Kostolanyova, 2017. "Flexible hybrid learning: comparison of two approaches and learning results," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 481-498.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:481-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:481-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.