IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v21y2017i4p435-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ways to enhance metacognition through the factors of learning processes, achievement goals and self-efficacy

Author

Listed:
  • Kam Cheong Li
  • Billy Tak-Ming Wong

Abstract

This study investigates the factors which influence university students' preferences in their learning processes, the orientations of their achievement goals, and the enhancement of their self-efficacy in learning. The examination of factors influencing these variables helps in devising measures to enhance students' metacognitive development. Fifty-four students participated in a questionnaire survey measuring their metacognitive level, and an interview inquiring into the reasons for their tendencies to use surface or deep processing, the motives for their types of achievement goals, and ways to enhance their self-efficacy in learning. The results showed the main factors that influence students' preference for deep or surface processing for learning, such as the amount of time, the nature of the course, their familiarity with the subject and their understanding of the learning materials. Ways that could enhance students' self-efficacy are also identified, such as receiving positive feedback from others and setting proper goals. However, no clear connection was found between students' achievement goals and their metacognitive level. Based on the findings, potential ways to develop students' metacognition are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kam Cheong Li & Billy Tak-Ming Wong, 2017. "Ways to enhance metacognition through the factors of learning processes, achievement goals and self-efficacy," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 435-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:435-448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84465
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:435-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.