IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v21y2017i4p379-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on the effectiveness of electronic and paper dictionaries: comparing the hybrid use of both and the pure use of either

Author

Listed:
  • Di Zou
  • Haoran Xie
  • Fu Lee Wang
  • Tak-Lam Wong
  • Qingyuan Wu

Abstract

Playing an important role in assisting vocabulary acquisition, dictionary use has been studied from various perspectives, among which, investigation of the facilitative effects of dictionary consultation in promoting word learning is a particular focus. However, no research has ever been conducted to compare the effectiveness of various approaches to dictionary consultation (e.g., the pure use of either paper or electronic dictionary, or the hybrid use of both). The present research, therefore, responds to this call and conducts two experiments among 185 language learners to examine the facilitative effects of diverse methods of dictionary use. We also interview the participants to inspect their perceptions of dictionary use. The empirical results demonstrate the superiority of the paper dictionary over the electronic dictionary, the usefulness of repetition, and the greater effectiveness of the hybrid use of both paper and electronic dictionary than the pure use of either. The results also shed light on the factors that are of concern to language learners while using dictionaries. We further conclude this study by highlighting the importance of processing for constructing memory, repetition for consolidating memory, and diversity for reinforcing memory in promoting word learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Zou & Haoran Xie & Fu Lee Wang & Tak-Lam Wong & Qingyuan Wu, 2017. "A study on the effectiveness of electronic and paper dictionaries: comparing the hybrid use of both and the pure use of either," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 379-398.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:379-398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84364
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:379-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.