IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v1y2004i3p312-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of e-learning for work-based training: an exploratory study of the Hong Kong apparel industry

Author

Listed:
  • Bessie Chong
  • Maris G. Martinsons
  • Michael Wong

Abstract

E-learning is a rapidly emerging alternative for work-based training. However, those seeking to adopt online work-based training are handicapped by the lack of theory-based empirical evidence to guide their efforts. This paper reports on a study of the factors that influence the staff's perception and adoption of work-based e-training. This study modifies the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and establishes a theoretical framework to analyse the determinants of adopting online work-based training. Unlike previous studies on technology acceptance/adoption, the adoption concept is divided into two facets, "Initial Adoption" which refers to current usage in terms of frequency and degree of usage and "Post Adoption" which refers to intention of continuous usage and knowledge implementation. This exploratory study shows that personal learning style, capability and perception on technology induce initial adoption, while sustained usage decisions are based solely on user-perceived, long-term benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Bessie Chong & Maris G. Martinsons & Michael Wong, 2004. "Adoption of e-learning for work-based training: an exploratory study of the Hong Kong apparel industry," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 312-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:1:y:2004:i:3:p:312-326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4886
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:1:y:2004:i:3:p:312-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.