IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v18y2015i4p397-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of hedonic and utilitarian values in consumer choice based on use and future adoption of technological products and innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Emílio José Montero Arruda Filho
  • Everaldo Marcelo Souza da Costa

Abstract

This work studies the usability, acceptance and adoption of technological products which consumers choose for their hedonic value but which are justified by such consumers on utilitarian grounds. The principal objective of this article is to discuss the behaviour of users of netbooks for didactic purposes. In order to analyse this behaviour which in this case is concerned with the usage and value perceptions that define consumer preferences, a 'netnographic' analytic method is used, which, similar to an ethnographic approach, examines the behaviour of individuals through a (written) description of the needs and values of virtual communities and cyberculture. The authors argue that the utilitarian value of the product is not key in its position and acceptance in the market; when the product presents ambiguous values (both utilitarian and hedonic), consumers tend to base their preference on the product's hedonic values. It is also argued that technological products link satisfaction to social status, creating differentiation through the level of actualisation of the users' products and a utilitarian preference for integrated products, given practical applications of these integrated features.

Suggested Citation

  • Emílio José Montero Arruda Filho & Everaldo Marcelo Souza da Costa, 2015. "Perceptions of hedonic and utilitarian values in consumer choice based on use and future adoption of technological products and innovations," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 397-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:18:y:2015:i:4:p:397-412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=72454
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:18:y:2015:i:4:p:397-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.