IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v18y2015i1p23-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facets and outcomes of healthcare service innovation: a study of catholic service providers in Northern Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Susana Marques
  • Carlos Peixeira Marques
  • Fernanda Nogueira
  • Chris Gerry
  • Sónia Andrade

Abstract

The aim of this study was to promote a better understanding of the factors influencing innovation in the provision of health services by branches of the Catholic church's 'Sacred House of Mercy' (Santa Casa de Misericórdia) operating in Portugal, and to determine the effects of innovation on the performance of individual staff and the local organisations as a whole. The chosen method for data collection was the questionnaire survey. The unit of analysis is constituted by the staff of Misericórdias in the North of Portugal that provide health services. To evaluate the relationship between innovation and performance, recourse was made to a structural equation model and AMOS 20 software. The results of the study suggest that the Misericórdias analysed display innovative behaviour that contributes positively to individual employee satisfaction, team spirit and overall organisational performance. The study provided a better understanding of the factors that influence innovation in this type of not-for-profit organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Susana Marques & Carlos Peixeira Marques & Fernanda Nogueira & Chris Gerry & Sónia Andrade, 2015. "Facets and outcomes of healthcare service innovation: a study of catholic service providers in Northern Portugal," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 23-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:23-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=70243
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:23-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.