IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v15y2014i2p167-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of collaborative and individual modes of concept maps on plant science: a comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ananta Kumar Jena

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of innovative spider/hierarchical collaborative concept map approach over spider/hierarchical individual concept map science learning among the elementary school students. Sixty-four seventh-grade students from an Indian elementary school participated in the study. It was an immediate and delayed test experimental design. To identify the effectiveness and differences between spider and hierarchical map approach, concerning collaborative and individual modes of learning; one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test were used. The result suggested that both collaborative spider and hierarchical concept map were significantly better than individual learning in science concept and collaborative spider map activity was significantly better than hierarchical map.

Suggested Citation

  • Ananta Kumar Jena, 2014. "Effects of collaborative and individual modes of concept maps on plant science: a comparative analysis," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 167-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:167-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=59759
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:167-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.