IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v10y2011i4p376-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational learning and competitive advantage: testing for the interacting influence of knowledge management and innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Moses Tahate Kamya
  • Joseph Mpeera Ntayi
  • Augustine Ahiauzu

Abstract

It is argued that in this era of globalisation and knowledge economy competitive advantage is a result of firm-specific resources and capabilities with characteristics of value, rareness, inimitability and non-substitutability. Accordingly, firms consider organisational learning, knowledge management and innovation as intangible resources for achieving competitive advantage however; little research has empirically examined the relationships between these resources especially in developing countries. The purpose of this paper is to empirically explore in a single model the relationships between organisational learning and competitive advantage with the interacting influence of knowledge management and innovation in a developing country such as Uganda in the Sub-Saharan Africa. The findings indicate that there is a positive relationship between organisational learning and competitive advantage and that the interactive influence of knowledge management and innovation increases the predictive power of the relationship. This paper discusses these findings and provides theoretical and managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Moses Tahate Kamya & Joseph Mpeera Ntayi & Augustine Ahiauzu, 2011. "Organisational learning and competitive advantage: testing for the interacting influence of knowledge management and innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 376-401.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:10:y:2011:i:4:p:376-401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:10:y:2011:i:4:p:376-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.