IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijient/v13y2026i3-4p513-530.html

Bridging the gap in digital governance request for proposal management: stakeholder analysis and automation techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Manisha Tiwari
  • Shagun Srivastava
  • Padmaja Joshi

Abstract

The domain of digital governance has an officially recognised procurement process for obtaining economical and good quality services and products. In this work, we explored the internal process of the procurement system where digital governance requests for proposal documents are manually reviewed by the internal team to make critical decisions for procuring the tender. A comprehensive survey involving stakeholders was conducted to understand their standpoint on introducing artificial intelligence in the internal process of procurement. An analysis result exhibits positive stakeholder perception towards artificial intelligence adoption, highlighting improved accuracy, efficiency, and ease of work. In accordance with survey results a text classification intervention was carried out for the request of proposal document to streamline the document analysis phase. The objective of the work is to automate the process of document classification for the procurement process of digital governance documents. The study contributes to understanding the role of technology acceptance in the procurement process and provides a framework for future advancements in procurement and digital governance process.

Suggested Citation

  • Manisha Tiwari & Shagun Srivastava & Padmaja Joshi, 2026. "Bridging the gap in digital governance request for proposal management: stakeholder analysis and automation techniques," International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3/4), pages 513-530.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijient:v:13:y:2026:i:3/4:p:513-530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=155411
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijient:v:13:y:2026:i:3/4:p:513-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=167 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.