IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v9y2017i3p209-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group division based on common weights in cross efficiency evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang Mengying
  • Jin Qin
  • Liu Hongwei

Abstract

In the traditional cross efficiency procedure, each decision making unit (DMU) offers a set of selfish weights to maximise its own efficiency. However, it is often not easy to be accepted by all other decision making units (DMUs). Since the cross efficiency of a DMU not only has a significant relevance with its own evaluation but also with other peer DMUs' measurement, a DMU may choose to cooperate or compete with some other DMUs to obtain a higher cross efficiency. Secondary-goal strategies, such as benevolent and aggressive strategies, have been applied in groups in which the relationship between each DMU is determined. With the benevolent strategy, all of the DMUs are under the situations of cooperation while they will compete with each other with the aggressive strategy. Obviously in reality, there is a situation in which alliances are often uncertain. Pure aggressive or benevolent strategy may be not suitable for the case. To solve this problem, the current paper proposes a new cross efficiency approach based on a series of common weights of each two DMUs. An example is given to illustrate our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang Mengying & Jin Qin & Liu Hongwei, 2017. "Group division based on common weights in cross efficiency evaluation," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 209-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:209-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86782
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:209-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.