IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v9y2017i2p168-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting dispatching rule in manufacturing systems via DEA cross efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Saba Sadeghi Gavgani
  • Majid Zohrehbandian
  • Nima Sadeghi

Abstract

Planning and scheduling techniques are the main concern of management of production systems, and the dispatching rules play an important role in scheduling industrial and production segments. In this regard, the correct selection of the facility dispatching rules in a production system is of great importance and selection of the best technique can improve the efficiency of the industrial segments. In this condition, a so called efficiency score can be identified for each dispatching rule according which the best can be chosen. Data envelopment analysis, as a scientific method, is used in evaluation of unit work but the classical models of that cannot present an overall work of the decision making units and in most cases it gives a specific score to more than one unit. As a result, the efficacy computed by this method cannot be suitable for ranking. Evaluation of cross efficiency is one of the suitable methods for ranking which has DEA ranking and, therefore the selection of the best units in different models would be a secondary goal. In this article, the cross efficiency method along with Liang et al. (2008) is used to select the best dispatching rule under secondary goal and a comparison is provided for the new and already used method.

Suggested Citation

  • Saba Sadeghi Gavgani & Majid Zohrehbandian & Nima Sadeghi, 2017. "Selecting dispatching rule in manufacturing systems via DEA cross efficiency," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 168-178.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:168-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84887
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:168-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.