IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v9y2017i1p27-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coastal ports efficiency evaluation and analysis when considering undesirable output

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Wu
  • Jing Liu
  • Dong Guo

Abstract

With the rapid development of China's economy, port pollution problems become serious in China. Port efficiency evaluations which take undesirable environmental outputs into consideration tend particularly important. Based on this observation, in this paper, we take pollution emissions as undesirable outputs and employ generalised directional distance function (GDDF) to evaluate the technical efficiency (TE) and comprehensive efficiency (CE) for the 21 coastal ports in China. Results show that: 1) for each of the ports, its CE value is higher than its TE value after considering undesirable output in efficiency evaluation during 2008-2012; 2) TE and CE values of the five port groups differ significantly, and 'strong north and weak south' phenomenon appears; 3) efficiency gaps among ports are obvious; 4) in order to achieve higher CE values, the southeast coastal port group, the southwest coastal port group and the pearl river delta port group need to reduce investment greatly.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Wu & Jing Liu & Dong Guo, 2017. "Coastal ports efficiency evaluation and analysis when considering undesirable output," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 27-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:27-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82402
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:27-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.